🧠 BLUF
Linda Sarsour openly bragged that Muslim-American PACs, including one linked to CAIR, helped power Zohran Mamdani’s political rise in New York.
Public records confirm: CAIR-associated money moved through a super PAC into a pro-Mamdani operation. That’s not a conspiracy theory; it’s on the books.
The viral “secretly bankrolled by jihad-linked CAIR groups” framing jumps past what’s documented, but it points at a real story: targeted funding, ideological alignment, and quiet influence.
The real scandal isn’t that money moved; it’s how little corporate media and big influencers want to touch the deeper question of who’s buying what kind of politics in America’s biggest city.
Keep reading below …
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
📡 CONTEXT
A viral post claims Linda Sarsour “admitted” that Mamdani’s rise was secretly bankrolled by “jihad-linked CAIR groups.” Strip away the tweet rage and you still have a hard fact pattern: a speech where Sarsour celebrates Muslim-American PAC money backing Mamdani, and campaign-finance records showing a CAIR-associated super PAC sending six-figure support to a pro-Mamdani PAC. That’s influence the public can see on paper. What’s missing is honest coverage of how identity-based PACs, ideological networks, and local machine politics intersect — and how quickly anyone asking those questions gets branded as bigoted or “conspiratorial.”
⚠️ THREAT PROFILE
What’s documented, what’s allegation, and why the silence is dangerous:
On-record funding moves:
Campaign-finance disclosures show a super-PAC called Unity and Justice Fund, associated with CAIR, donating over $100,000 to a pro-Mamdani super PAC during NYC campaign season. That’s direct, traceable financial support.Sarsour’s own framing:
In public remarks, Sarsour points to “Muslim-American money PACs” and names “Unity and Justice Fund PAC” as backing Mamdani. She frames this as strategic community mobilisation — not as something hidden — but it still confirms an organized funding pipeline.Broader giving pattern:
CAIR-linked and aligned PACs don’t fund just one race; they support multiple candidates who align with progressive platforms and specific foreign-policy and civil-liberties narratives, especially around Islamophobia, Israel, and Middle East policy.Loaded language vs. provable links:
The tweet language — “secretly bankrolled” and “jihad-linked CAIR groups” — injects conclusions on top of the facts.“Secretly” is hard to sustain when the checks show up in public filings.
“Jihad-linked” leans on wider debates about CAIR’s ideological and organizational roots, but it’s not an official terror designation in this context.
Unverified penetration claims:
Assertions that CAIR has “completely penetrated” the State Department, Pentagon, and Congress are not backed by declassified evidence. They may reflect concern about ideological influence and staff-level relationships, but they’re still claims, not proven institutional capture.Media & influencer blackout:
The biggest tell: most mainstream outlets will happily cover “historic” minority wins and “grassroots energy,” but go almost silent on who funded what, and why, once CAIR or Brotherhood-adjacent networks are involved. That silence is itself part of the influence operation.
STAND WITH THE MISSION...
If you rely on our SITREPs and ThreatWire briefings to stay ahead of what’s coming, upgrade to Guardian today. Your support keeps SDN independent and our intelligence flowing – no filters, no sponsors, no censorship.
🧍♂️ FOR EVERYDAY AMERICANS — HOW TO READ THIS
Follow the money, not the spin: When a candidate’s rise is sold as “purely grassroots,” check campaign-finance databases for PAC and super-PAC money — including identity- and religion-based PACs.
Separate data from adjectives:
Data: CAIR-linked PAC → six-figure checks → pro-Mamdani PAC.
Adjectives: “secretly,” “jihad-linked,” “bankrolled.” Keep them in different mental buckets.
Watch the narrative shield: If asking about CAIR or Brotherhood-adjacent ideology gets you labeled “Islamophobic” instantly, that’s a feature, not a bug — it’s how scrutiny is dissuaded.
Track votes, not just vibes: Compare who funded the campaign with how the politician votes on Israel, terror policy, immigration, and speech laws. Influence is revealed in policy outcomes, not just hashtags.
Reject both denial and hysteria: It’s possible to say “yes, real influence is happening” without leaping to “100% foreign control” or demonizing every Muslim-American voter. Precision is power.
Get the POC-1 Ultras for only $399 for two radios and no annual fee for LTE network service for the life of the radios. This price is only for the first 1,000 units sold. After that they’ll be $1,140 a pair, and $29 to $65 a year for LTE service.
Get them HERE.
🔊 FEATURED OFFER / GEAR BLOCK
Preparedness Essentials — Partners We Trust
Why here: when institutions drift and narratives are managed, personal preparedness, comms, and legal protection become your last line of defense.
👉 Consider vetted options for training tools (Mantis), legal defense (CCWSafe).
👥 FOR CIVIC LEADERS, JOURNALISTS & POLICY STAFF — PUBLIC-SAFE ACTIONS
Normalize hard questions: Treat CAIR-linked PACs the same way you’d treat oil, tech, or defense money—ask what the donor gets in return on policy and access.
Demand transparency standards: Push for clearer PAC naming, donor disclosures, and real-time reporting so “community” money can’t quietly mask ideological pipelines.
Map ecosystems, not caricatures: Build open-source maps of orgs, PACs, and messaging hubs tied to specific ideological currents—including Islamist-aligned, hard-left, or corporate networks.
Resist the slur shortcut: Don’t let “racist” or “Islamophobe” be the automatic kill switch on legitimate inquiry into CAIR’s role, Brotherhood-adjacent ideology, or foreign-policy lobbying efforts.
Brief principals honestly: Bosses need concise, sourced memos on where money came from and what narratives that donor ecosystem is pushing—before they show up at the photo op.
🛰️ WHAT TO WATCH — OPERATIONAL INDICATORS
New campaign-finance filings showing repeat CAIR-associated PAC support for tightly clustered slates of candidates.
Coordination between CAIR statements, Sarsour/Mamdani messaging, and city-level policy pushes (boycotts, policing changes, foreign-policy resolutions).
Media pieces that celebrate “representation” but omit PAC names and dollar amounts entirely — a tell that the influence story is being buried.
Emerging calls to treat any scrutiny of CAIR-linked funding as “hate speech” or grounds for deplatforming.
INFORMATION IS SURVIVAL...
Free subscribers get the headlines. Guardians get the intel – private Signal channels, emergency alerts, and direct access to our team. When things go bad, which one do you want your family and friends to be?
🧠 SDN ANALYSIS — JON WHEATON
Influence in a republic is supposed to be visible, who funds you, who organizes for you, who you vote with. Here we have a clean triad: Sarsour’s own words, CAIR-linked PAC money, and Mamdani’s ascent. That’s not speculation; that’s the public record. The jump to “jihad bankrolling” may overshoot the evidence, but the media’s refusal to even walk up to the line is its own kind of corruption.
The right move is simple: read the disclosures, connect them to votes, and keep asking who benefits. Don’t let fear of a label stop you from naming patterns that are right in front of your face.
GodSpeed
Jon Wheaton
